Roth vs. Traditional: if taxes are lower in retirement, why use a Roth?

Short answer: if you are paying a high marginal income-tax rate today and reasonably expect the same dollars to face a meaningfully lower rate when withdrawn in retirement, a Traditional pre-tax contribution can have a mathematical advantage. A Roth can still be useful because retirement income may be higher than expected, Roth money can reduce future taxable-income pressure, original owners are not currently subject to lifetime RMDs on Roth IRAs or designated Roth employer-plan accounts, and having both tax types gives you more flexibility. The decision is less “taxable versus tax-free” and more which tax bill do you want, and when?¹³

First: your understanding of Roth is correct

With a designated Roth contribution in a workplace plan, the contribution is included in current taxable income. With pre-tax salary deferrals, the contribution generally is not included in current federal taxable income. Later, pre-tax deferrals and their earnings are generally taxable when distributed, while qualified Roth distributions can exclude both contributions and earnings from gross income.¹

Traditional and Roth IRAs use similar tax ideas, but IRA deductibility, Roth IRA income eligibility and distribution rules add their own details. Traditional IRA contributions may be deductible depending on the taxpayer's circumstances; Roth IRA contributions are not deductible, and qualified Roth IRA distributions can be tax-free.²

The simplest way to understand the math

Remove investment growth entirely and start with $10,000 of pre-tax income available to save. Assume today's marginal income-tax rate is 24%.

Traditional

The full $10,000 goes into the account because the model assumes it receives pre-tax treatment. If that money is eventually taxed at 22%, the modeled spendable value is $7,800.

Roth

At a 24% current tax rate, $2,400 goes to current income tax and $7,600 is left to put into Roth under the same $10,000 pre-tax saving budget. If the later distribution is qualified, Terra treats that Roth money as tax-free. Spendable value: $7,600.

What if the tax rate is the same?

If today's tax rate is 24% and the future tax rate is also 24%, the basic same-economic-cost math is essentially a tie. The same return and the same time period multiply both sides; they do not create a Roth advantage by themselves.

So won't my tax rate automatically fall when I retire?

It may. Many people stop receiving a large salary and have lower taxable income in retirement. If you are in a high marginal bracket during peak earning years and later withdraw those Traditional dollars at a lower rate, taking the deduction today can be very attractive.

But retirement does not automatically mean low taxable income. A retiree can have pension income, Social Security, Traditional IRA or 401(k) distributions, investment income and eventually required minimum distributions. Some or all of pension payments may be taxable, depending on the plan and the participant's basis.⁴ Social Security can also become partly taxable as other income rises; under current federal rules, up to 85% of benefits can be included in taxable income in some situations.⁵

Why might a younger or lower-income worker favor Roth?

Someone early in a career may be paying a relatively low tax rate today and expect much higher earnings later. Paying the tax at today's lower rate can be attractive. Roth can also make sense during unusually low-income years — for example, a career break or a temporary period between jobs — when the tax cost of a Roth contribution or conversion may be lower than usual.

Why might a high-income worker favor Traditional?

Someone in peak earning years may be avoiding a relatively high marginal tax rate with each pre-tax contribution. If that person expects lower taxable income after retiring, Traditional can be a strong choice. Roth is not automatically the sophisticated choice; sometimes the current deduction is the most valuable part of the decision.

RMDs can change the retirement tax picture

Under current law, Traditional IRAs and most employer retirement-plan accounts eventually become subject to required minimum distributions. Roth IRAs and designated Roth accounts in 401(k) and 403(b) plans do not require lifetime distributions while the original owner is alive, although beneficiaries are subject to distribution rules.³

That matters because a large Traditional balance can eventually create taxable income whether or not the retiree needs that entire distribution for spending. Roth assets provide another pool of money that can be used without a qualified withdrawal adding federal taxable income.

Tax diversification may be the most practical reason to own both

Imagine reaching retirement with every retirement dollar in Traditional accounts. Most retirement-account withdrawals can potentially add to taxable income. Now imagine having Traditional assets, Roth assets and taxable investments. You have more choices about where a particular year's spending comes from.

A low-income year may be a good time to deliberately recognize more taxable Traditional income. A high-income year may make Roth withdrawals more useful. The point is not that Roth always saves taxes. The benefit is having another lever to pull.

This is why Roth can be thought of as a form of tax diversification: you know the tax cost of the contribution today and gain more certainty around qualified Roth withdrawals later. The value of that certainty depends heavily on how expensive today's tax rate is.

State taxes belong in the comparison too

Federal tax brackets are only part of the decision. Someone working in a high-income-tax state today and planning to retire in a state with little or no individual income tax may find Traditional more attractive. The opposite can also happen.

Terra's calculator lets you choose the tax-rate assumptions. You can use federal marginal rates only, or a combined federal-plus-state/local estimate. The important thing is to use a consistent definition for today's rate and the expected retirement rate.

What if I can max out the account either way?

This is an important wrinkle. In a workplace plan that offers both pre-tax and designated Roth deferrals, the employee's pre-tax and Roth elective deferrals share the same combined annual limit.⁶

If you can contribute the same maximum nominal amount to Roth and pay the current tax from money outside the retirement account, you are putting more after-tax wealth inside the tax-advantaged account space. A $20,000 qualified Roth balance is not economically identical to a $20,000 Traditional balance because the Traditional balance still carries a future income-tax liability.

That is a different comparison from Terra's current calculator. The calculator intentionally asks: “If I have the same amount of pre-tax income available to devote to retirement saving, which treatment produces more modeled spendable value?” Both questions are legitimate; they simply answer different problems.

What about a surviving spouse?

Tax diversification can become more valuable after one spouse dies. Some household income may disappear, but investment assets can remain substantial. A pension may continue in part, one Social Security benefit may continue, and Traditional accounts may still create taxable withdrawals or RMDs. The survivor may also eventually move from married-filing-jointly tax brackets to single brackets.

Roth assets can provide another source of qualified tax-free spending without necessarily increasing taxable income. Terra's deeper Retirement Income & Cash Flow Planner has a separate Survivor Planning layer because this is a different question from the quick Roth-vs.-Traditional contribution comparison.

Pros and cons in plain English

Five situations where Traditional deserves a closer look

• Your marginal tax rate is high today.
• You reasonably expect substantially lower taxable income later.
• You expect to retire in a lower-tax state.
• The current tax benefit helps you afford a larger retirement contribution.
• You already have substantial Roth assets and want tax diversification in the other direction.

Five situations where Roth deserves a closer look

• Your marginal tax rate is relatively low today.
• You expect higher taxable income or a higher marginal rate later.
• You expect a large pension, large Traditional balances or meaningful future RMDs.
• You want more control over taxable income in retirement.
• You already have substantial Traditional retirement assets and want another tax bucket.

You do not have to choose one forever

Many employer plans allow participants to split elective deferrals between pre-tax and designated Roth contributions, subject to the combined annual limit and the plan's terms.⁶ A person's mix can also change over time. Someone may favor Roth in lower-income years, favor Traditional during peak earning years, and revisit the mix as retirement approaches.

That can be more rational than trying to predict one exact tax rate decades into the future.

What this does not say

This article does not predict future tax law or tell you which account is best for you. It also does not determine Traditional IRA deductibility, Roth IRA eligibility, contribution limits, employer matching, nondeductible basis, early-distribution penalties or whether a particular Roth distribution will qualify for tax-free treatment. Those details can materially affect a real decision.

Primary references

1. Internal Revenue Service — Roth account in your retirement plan. Explains that designated Roth contributions are currently taxed while pre-tax salary deferrals are not taxed when contributed; pre-tax deferrals and earnings are taxable when withdrawn, while qualified Roth contributions and earnings are not. IRS · Roth account in your retirement plan
2. Internal Revenue Service — Publications 590-A and 590-B. Traditional IRA contributions may be deductible depending on circumstances; Roth IRA contributions are not deductible, and qualified Roth IRA distributions can be tax-free. IRS · Publication 590-A · IRS · Publication 590-B
3. Internal Revenue Service — Required minimum distributions. Traditional IRAs and most employer-plan accounts are generally subject to lifetime RMD rules; original owners are not currently required to take lifetime RMDs from Roth IRAs or designated Roth accounts. IRS · RMD rules
4. Internal Revenue Service — Topic No. 410, Pensions and Annuities. Pension and annuity payments from qualified employer plans may be fully or partly taxable depending on basis and other facts. IRS · Pensions and annuities
5. Internal Revenue Service — Social Security benefits may be taxable. The taxable portion depends on filing status and other income; under current federal rules, up to 85% of benefits can be taxable in some situations. IRS · Social Security taxation overview
6. Internal Revenue Service — Designated Roth accounts and 401(k) contribution limits. Pre-tax and designated Roth elective deferrals share a combined annual employee deferral limit; participants may split contributions between the two as their plan permits. IRS · Designated Roth account · IRS · 401(k) contribution limits

Common questions

Keep reading